FUE vs DHI Which One Is Better For You?

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Direct Hair Implantation (DHI) are two popular techniques used in hair transplantation

FUE vs DHI

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Direct Hair Implantation (DHI) are two popular techniques used in hair transplantation. Both methods aim to address hair loss and restore natural-looking hairlines, but they differ in their approach and execution. Here's a comparison:

1. Technique:

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE):** In FUE, individual hair follicles are extracted from the donor area (usually the back or sides of the scalp) using a small punch tool or a microneedle. These follicles are then transplanted into the recipient area (where hair is thinning or balding).

Direct Hair Implantation (DHI):** DHI is a modified version of FUE. In DHI, the extraction and implantation of hair follicles are done simultaneously using a specialized tool called a Choi Implanter Pen. This allows for a more precise and controlled placement of grafts directly into the recipient area without the need for creating incisions beforehand.

2. Implantation Process:

- FUE:** After extraction, the harvested follicles are kept in a solution until they are implanted into the recipient area. Tiny incisions are made in the recipient site, and the grafts are then placed manually or with the help of implantation tools.

- DHI:With DHI, there's a direct implantation process. The Choi Implanter Pen implants the hair follicles directly into the recipient area without the need for creating incisions separately.

3. Time and Precision:

- FUE:FUE may take longer compared to DHI as the extraction and implantation processes are separate. The precision of graft placement depends on the skill of the surgeon.

- DHI: DHI is known for its precision due to the simultaneous extraction and implantation process. It requires a skilled surgeon and specialized equipment.

4. Recovery and Results:

- FUE: Recovery time for FUE is relatively quick, with minimal scarring. The final results may take several months to become fully visible.

- DHI: DHI also offers a quick recovery time and minimal scarring. Results may also take several months to show, but the direct implantation process can lead to faster growth and potentially denser results.

5. Suitability:

- FUE: Suitable for most patients, especially those with medium to large areas of hair loss. It's also suitable for individuals who want to keep their hair short.

- DHI: DHI can be suitable for similar candidates as FUE but may be preferred by individuals seeking a more precise and potentially faster implantation process.

Both FUE and DHI are effective hair restoration techniques, and the choice between them depends on various factors including the patient's preferences, the expertise of the surgeon, and the specific requirements of the case. It's important to consult with a qualified hair transplant specialist to determine the most suitable technique for individual needs.

Contact us

Phone number
+44 750 375 3001
Phone number
+90 541 362 5030
Email
info@welfareabroad.com

Send us a message

Optional
Max. 500 characters
Optional